There's no need to influence. Does an aware caretaker try to make conversation with a chicken?
“Howdy friends, when I first rolled into the ranch, they had me tend to the animals. As I shoveled manure, I had the time to ask many questions to myself…”
Who are you to influence anyone, and why does it matter to you soooo much? The very desire speaks to how deep you’re chained to duality. Become aware and choose your attachments.
“Does an aware animal caretaker try to make conversation with a chicken?”
You don’t have to share why and how you deconstructed the belief systems that others cling. You aren’t obligated to provide your energy so ‘they may change’. There’s no real need, as you realize they’ve made their choice. Share for sharing sake, without ‘goal or purpose’, as a symptom of what you are. Emotional attachment doesn’t have to be a negative thing.
The perception of ‘humanity’ is a flexible vantage. SO why do you have to ‘make a difference’? You don’t. This is the phrase used by those who aren’t present, but who use every smart sounding non-present transformational vernacular word to make you think they are. Not saying you can’t make a ‘difference’, just that it’s best to leave self-judgment from it.
“Do you spend time with cows, discussing the reason for their confinement?”
“Sometimes you have to talk where the animals will overhear. But, don’t expect them to understand.”
There’s little need to influence others. You are not necessarily here to act, observe, or react; although many will say you are. Most be-ings are here just to watch, a few are here to act, and a few are here to create. It’s all right.
“There are times when the barnyard denizens become agitated at your chatter. The larger beasts will tend to nudge the others until there’s a strong possibility of getting ran down by a stampede of irritated pigs, or attacked be a flock of Rhode Island Reds.”
We are NOT all here to influence or respond. Who the heck didn’t question the premise? You may not be the ‘human’ you think. You may not be what you’ve been considering ‘human’. You may just be a cog or gear in the machine ; )
“Remember, recognizing the state that ‘lacks purpose and purposelessness’ is not saying you’re ‘giving up’ on those creatures in the pen. It’s just that you’re now understanding how sturdy the pens have been built.”
Adjust your attachments to what you believe others can understand, not only for the farm, but your perception of humanity.
Considerations
Some say we’re in an age of enlightenment, others say we’ve never been so far. Perhaps the goal of all this worldly ‘truth revelation’ is to lock you into duality.’
Although I appreciate the sensibilities and hope that awareness is growing in this world, it is not. People are as willfully ignorant as they have ever been. Most statements that point this direction are due to the speaker having attracted like minded and aware people to their social circle. Nothing ever changes in duality, and no more people today (in ratio) are awake than have been in ‘history’. While it’s great that so many have opened up to choice, awareness, and the nature of their actual experience… it cannot be said that it is anything more than at any other time. What makes your observation seem solid is that you’ve attracted the similar minded around your fractal experience.
There is no age of Aquarius, no expanding of universal consciousness, we remain as willfully ignorant as ever. The real expansion is ONLY with you!
Wanting to change the world is proclaiming that you believe that others don’t have choice. It’s an extension of either ego gone wild or a solid sense of unworthiness and helplessness.
Wanting to change the world is final refuge of cleverness unwilling to work on themselves.
Wanting to change the world is like going to a kennel and trying to change the german shepherds into schnauzers.
Yet, bringing together both ‘no drive to influence’ and ‘the desire to influence to make change’ has no wrong or right with either direction.
The state of ‘no need to influence’ and the compulsion ‘to change the world’ are indeed two different approaches to navigating your life. They are not mutually exclusive.
Closely connected is the dichotomy of expectancy and expectation. Here again, there’s no correct way to proceed, but benefits to embracing each, depending on the wishes of the observer.
Usually, only moderately unattached focus is the symptom of the state of loose ‘expectancy’ - where attachment is seldom seen.
Intense experience of ‘expectation’ brings adventure, including the polar sensations of pleasure and pain.
Again, there’s nothing right or wrong with attachment, if you’re aware it’s you who gave consent.
Perhaps you are providing tools to help people become MORE ignorant! This is indeed a possibility. But influencing those who have already made the choice (conscious or not) to ‘ignore’ is useless, a waste of energy, and no different than feeding scorpions by hand. ; )
So this discussion is not about ‘influencing’, it’s about providing tools, compassion in a state of peace, presence, and unconditional love. Again, here in this ‘dimension’ the vantage may appear to change, yet it always is just an iteration of the same old thing. ‘Influence’ refers NOT to ‘behavior’, for that’s more akin to ‘force’ and ‘persuasion’ through its different means. Better … ‘influence’ can’t occur where there is choice. It just looks like it’s ‘influence’ to the eye peering through that vantage.
It’s not that no-thing has changed. There are aware beings and very unaware beings, whereby the highly intelligent who are powerfully brain washed are now unable and unwilling to change their beliefs.
What I do may ‘look’ like ‘influence’, but it’s not. I have no need for ‘you’ to change at the ‘heart’ level. I may want to modify your ‘behavior’, but that’s only the ‘modification’ of external action, inaction, and behavior.
If anything, I simply see ‘you’ as a component of ‘me’, and am planting outer-di-men-sional seeds for the infinite amount of souls to nourish at their volition in time and space.
A soul cannot be influenced in any permanent way.
It is what is is, what it decided to be, until it decides to no longer be what it is.
The word ‘influence’ needs to be changed, defined more specifically, or it the concept needs a new word that refers more accurately to the dimensions, the soul, and the spirit.
Declarations
I am sovereign and free of having to fix anyone.
I am sovereign and free of having to fix the world.
I am sovereign and free of having to fix myself… only if I choose integration is it so. There is no right or wrong about it. There is no need for ‘salvation’.